Monthly Archives: July 2014

An “Aha” of a Different Form!

Interestingly enough, my “aha” moment did not come regarding curriculum, rather, it came in understanding the professionalism which is evident at my externship. It came from understanding there is a needed change in how we, as educators, view our own profession.

images

Stimulated partly from my discussion with Allison, and partly with all my mentors of Novant, I have come to find that a growth in advocacy, individualized professional development, and collaboration must occur in order for the education profession to soar. And while I had “aha” moments for my students, I believe the aforementioned “aha” is just as worthy in describing for it impacts colleagues (and ultimately, many more students!)

 

In doing so, I thank my mentors of Novant and Lenovo; from the individuals I’ve met, to the meetings attended, it has left me to wonder, “WHY can’t the education profession be this way?” And when I mean “this way,” I mean all of which I speak of here: Leaving your Comfort Zone: What it means for the Education Profession.

RMS

Forget “Houston.” Time, We have a Problem.

Time.

Anyone else have an issue with time?

In the midst of writing curriculum, the greatest challenge one comes across is the lack of 48 hours in a day. Or 72.

Unknown

The ability to effectively develop an integrated and challenging curriculum is dependent upon the ability to have the time, and resources for such. As most teachers would agree, enough planning time is essential to their state of well-being within the classroom. To create a customized approach which reflects the experiences I have had with Novant and Lenovo, means being ensured with enough time to process and plan such. With such, I have found barely enough time to process. Let alone plan.

To narrow the ideas, to align them to standards, here lies yet another issue with time. Where is the time to complete all the lessons? Where is the time to gather the resources? Where is the time to collaborate with colleagues to evaluate and restructure lesson components if need be? Where are those “colleagues?”

The hard part is not generating the ideas, the creativity. I believe this is a gift of teachers, amongst many others, to figure a way in which to relate the often stereotyped “meaningless” concepts into ones of immense engagement. Rather, it is the battle of finding the time to develop, and execute well-written plans to be used by others. There is no doubt, as most educators will agree, that such will get done. This is yet another gift of teachers, to somehow complete tasks, working magic, creating time when there is little to begin with.

I just wish I had the magic to turn a 24 hour day into a 48 hour one. Or 72.

RMS

Dissipating the Fear: Technology 101 (?)

Fear.

How many educators are fearful not of innovation, but of not being provided the professional development (PD) necessary to implement the innovation we are pushed to provide our students?

As I foresee within my own school system, albeit change is occurring, educators are not fearful of the tools, we are fearful of the professional development that is lacking in order to implement such tools. In order to effectively empower and implement the tools necessary to transform learning in the digital age, educators must be given similar access to professional development which will help them develop expertise in technology.

No, I don’t mean the sit-and-get, chalk-and-talk PD format. I mean, TRUE, effective digital professional development that has educators practicing, failing, succeeding, and repeating such a process throughout the entire school year. I recently came across an article by ASCD which considers several components to the challenges we as educators face to technology based on a study entitled, “The Next Generation of Teachers” at the Harvard Graduate School of EducationScreen Shot 2014-07-05 at 5.39.07 PM

Photo Credit: Edudemic.com

1. Is there access to on-site and on-time professional development?

2. Is there a “professional culture” that is oriented around support and recommendation?

3. Are we acknowledging that not all staff members are on the same level as one another when it comes to technology proficiency? And if so, is there sustained, innovative and scaffolded professional development to meet an array of staff?

4. Are we developing a collaborative environment which uses the resources of our teachers to help one another become proficient and innovative with technology?

If such questions can be honestly considered and addressed by school systems, than I believe the fear around technology may dissipate. In fact, I think we as a profession may begin to embrace the change in a constructive manner that will only progress our students’ success and impact on this ever-evolving world around us.

The New Literacies: Creativity and Leadership

I had the incredible pleasure of beginning my externship this past week with Novant Health of Rowan. When original notification that I would be partnering with Novant (in addition to Lenovo) occurred, I imagined the externship going the only avenue I could perceive it to, that being the shadowing of medical specialists. I assumed I would be obtaining a workable understanding of the communication and academic sets necessary to provide more than adequate patient care.

How very wrong some assumptions can be (and how one learns not to assume so quickly!)

As I came to realize in a short matter of time (yet failed to realize many years previously) in order to create the functioning system we as patients view as seamless, numerous teams must come together with individuals of a varying array of skill sets. Looking from the outside-in, it is easy to ignore the notion that the hospital is a cohesive unit for the extent of whom we interact with is limited to our primary care specialist. However, just as with our own community beyond our doorstep, there are members whom we don’t interact with that drive its inter workings.

On my first day, I had the distinct pleasure of meeting several department heads, as well as the administrative leaders within the Novant Health System of Rowan. When prompted with the question, “what is the Kenan Fellowship,” a spiral discussion on topics related to leadership, communication, and inquiry derived. Often, I directed a question to the department heads related to “what do you hope to see from this fellowship for Novant, as well as the students within Rowan-Salisbury Schools?”

Screen Shot 2014-07-05 at 4.55.28 PM

And it was simple: all wanted our students to understand that the STEM approaches we consider separate, are interwoven amongst all areas. That when we think “health care,” we need to think beyond the stigma of “physicians and nurses.” We must understand that the hospital works much like a community, supporting one another in all assets of its mission: to promote high quality health care for patients. For instance, how many know that the Environmental Services Department (EVS) is actually a huge component that keeps the hospital running, and without it, the hospital would shut down in a matter of days? How many know that the Phlebotomist, Histotechnologist, and Pathologist are key to the diagnosis of your condition? How many know the leadership set necessary to be successful in any job? We must understand that the problems needing to be solved, alongside the skills necessary to do such, ought to be presented to students far earlier than the college lecture hall.

And within one day, and one discussion with the Food Services Director, additional characteristics and questions of self-accountability and leadership in relation to the classroom setting arouse:

1. How do we promote leadership development for our students?

2. How do we promote the concepts of communication and ethics in relation to managing diversity?

3. If our goal as a nation are to become a world competitor in STEM fields, then are we recognizing the relationship between how we utilize such knowledge, and its relationship to leadership?

4. Are we promoting leadership, STEM, and creativity as literacies for our students?

5. And as we move forward with such questions, we must then consider as educators are we allowing students the freedom, flexibility, and time to develop the creativity and leaderships skills necessary to solve problems within the working world?

6. Are we as educators streamlining STEM in a way that isolates the concepts, and harms our students from understanding that STEM IS interwoven and so much more than Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math?

Now my question becomes such: how do we as educators, or even as a country promoting STEM, move forward in planning a curriculum or classroom environment that addresses these deficits?