Whitworth University

https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0048

Abstract

Professional Growth Plans (PGPs), a model of professional development for educators, were completed in the context of Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) as part of a grant from a state Professional Educator Standards Board. Participants were in the Pacific Northwest of the United States and represented different educator roles in two urban elementary schools. The PGP process was introduced in PLCs and focused on the implementation of High Leverage Practices (HLPs) for inclusive classrooms (McLeskey et al., 2019).

In a collaborative effort with university facilitators, educators engaged in tenets of Participatory Action Research (PAR) through enactment of the PGP process to implement and reflect on outcomes related to their use of HLPs. Educators selected PGP goals focused on areas of instructional growth and improvement of student performance. PAR was enacted in the context of educators’ individual instructional settings through implementation of PGPs. The purpose of the grant was to familiarize and support educators in the PGP process. The purpose of the study was to identify educators’ perceived benefits and challenges with the implementation of PGPs within the context of a collaborative PLC.

Keywords

professional growth plan, professional learning community, professional development, collaboration, participatory action research, high leverage practices

Full Text

Educators’ Perceptions of Professional Growth Plans in the Context of Professional Learning Communities

References

Ball, D. L., & Forzani, F. M. (2011). Building a common core for learning to teach: And connecting professional learning to practice. American Educator, 35(2), 17.
https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/ball_forzani_17-39.pdf

Blanton, L.P. & Perez, Y. (2011). Exploring the relationship between special education teachers and professional learning communities: Implications of research for administrators. Journal of Special Education Leadership. 24, 6-16.

Bradbury, H., Mirvis, P., Neilsen, E., & Pasmore, W. (2008). Action research at work: Creating the future following the path from Lewin. In Reason, P. & Bradbury, H. The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 77-92). Sage.

Braun V. & Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3, 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Caniglia, C. (2016). Special education teachers’ reported preparedness and confidence to implement the 2012 CEC initial level special educator preparation standards (Doctoral dissertation). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. (Accession No.10139774)

Charmaz, K. (2014). Grounded theory in global perspective: Reviews by international researchers. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(9),1074-1084. doi:10.1177/1077800414545235

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research. Sage.

Coghlan, D., Brannick, T. (2014). Doing action research in your own organization. Sage.

Council for Exceptional Children (2020). High leverage practices in special education: About the HLPs. Retrieved from: https://highleveragepractices.org/about-hlps/ August 31, 2020.

Dana, N.F. & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2014). The reflective educator′s guide to classroom research:

          Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Corwin.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Constructing twenty-first century teacher education. Journal of

          Teacher Education, 57(3), 300-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487105285962

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (2011). Policies that support professional development in the era of reform. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200622

Ferrance, E. (2000). Themes in education: Action research. Northeast and Islands Regional Educational Laboratory.

Guskey, T. (1985). Staff development and teacher change. Educational Leadership, 7, 57-60.

Herr, K. & Anderson, G.L. (2015). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. All Books and Media by Montclair State University Authors. 143. https://digitalcommons.montclair.edu/all_books/143

Hong, C. & Lawrence, S.A. (2011). Action research in teacher education: classroom inquiry,      reflection, and data-driven decision making. Journal of Inquiry and Action in Education,   4(2), 1-17.

Hord, S.M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Johnson A.P. (2008). A short guide to action research (3rd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.

Johnson, M., Keskey, S., Moore, M., & Sherwin, L. (2019). Professional learning grant kickoff. Professional Educator Standards Board [PowerPoint slides].

Khan, R., Grijalva, R., & Enriquez-Gates, A. (2019). Teachers as change agents: Promoting meaningful professional development using action research to support international  educational reform. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 5(2), 214-225. doi:10.32865/fire201952167

Leko, M.M. & Brownell, M.T. (2009). Crafting quality professional development for special educators: What school leaders should know. Teaching Exceptional Children, 42, 64-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990904200106

McCormick, J. (2001). The professional growth plan: A school leader’s guide to the process. Skylight Professional Development.

Mertler, C. A. (2017). Action research: Improving schools and empowering educators (5th ed.). Sage.

McLeskey, J., Billingsley, B. & Ziegler, D. (2018). Using high-leverage practices inteacher preparation to reduce the research-to-practice gap in inclusive settings.Australasian Journal of Special and Inclusive Education. 42, 3-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/jsi.2018.3

McLeskey, J., Maheady, L., Billingsley, B., Brownell, M., & Lewis, T. (2018). High leverage practices for inclusive classrooms. Routledge.

Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed). Sage.

Mills, G.E. (2011). Action research: a guide for the teacher researcher (4th ed.). Pearson.

Picanco, K. & Caniglia, C. (2020). Creating inclusive classrooms through collaborative action research with professional growth plans. The WERA Educational Journal. 13(1), 22-26.

Peini, J. (2003). Planning, measuring their own growth. Journal of Staff Development. 24(1), 38-42.

Peini, J. (2008). The educator′s professional growth plan: A process for developing staff and improving instruction. Corwin Press.

Professional Educator Standards Board (2019). Professional learning grant post-survey [online survey].

Rubin, A. (2013). Statistics for evidence-based practice and evaluation (3^rd ed.). Cengage.

Smith, J.A. & Osborn, M. (2008) Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J.A. Smith (Ed.) Qualitative Psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53-80). Sage.

Swantz, M. (2008). Participatory action research as practice. In Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of action research (pp. 31-48). SAGE Publications Ltd, https://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848607934

Stringer, E.T. (2014). Action research (4th ed). Sage.

Tichenor, M., Heins, E., & Piechura, K. (2017). Professional growth plans for preservice teachers: An opportunity for reflection and growth. PDS Partners, 13(1), 13-20.

Vaughan, M. & Burnaford, G. (2016). Action research in graduate teacher education: a review of the literature 2000-2015. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 280-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2015.1062408

Ziemki, L, & Ross, D.B. (2014). A professional growth plan for lifelong learners. Fischler College of Education: Faculty Articles. 175. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/fse_facarticles/175