Bringing Informal Science Education to Elementary Pre-service Teacher Preparation


The purpose of this study was to explore how a health-based informal science education course, as part of an elementary undergraduate teacher preparation program, influenced pre-service teachers’ ideas about formal and informal science teaching and learning. Additionally, the study explored how the course impacted their understandings of the value of bridging informal science to supplement formal instruction. Qualitative study data were gathered through two (mid- and end-of-semester) focus group interviews with five pre-service teachers enrolled in a health-based informal science course. Analysis of data indicated that the inclusion of informal science education experiences during PST preparation has the potential to support novice teachers’ developing ideas about science teaching and learning including ways to connect science to students’ lives and make science engaging and meaningful. Findings are reported in four key themes that emerged from the data: (a) formal teacher preparation and informal education, (b) connections between formal and informal science education, (c) personal and professional collaborations, and (d) benefits of informal science education.


Informal science education; elementary; teacher preparation

Full Text:



Abell, S. K., & Roth, M. (1992). Constraints to teaching elementary science. A case study of a science enthusiast student. Science Education, 76(6), 581–595.

Anderson, D., Lawson, B., & Mayer‐Smith, J. (2006). Investigating the impact of a practicum experience in an aquarium on pre‐service teachers. Teaching Education, 17(4), 341-353.

Author (2009)

Avraamidou, L. (2015) Reconceptualizing elementary teacher preparation: A case for informal science education their development. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 108-135.

Avraamidou, L. (2014). Developing a reform-minded science teaching identity: The role of informal science environments. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(7), 823-843.

Bush, G. W. (2001). No child left behind act. HRI United States Department of Education. Retrieved October, 28, 2008.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.

Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of educational research, 76(4), 607-651.

Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press.

Jung, M. L., & Tonso, K. L. (2006). Elementary preservice teachers learning to teach science in science museums and nature centers: A novel program’s impact on science knowledge, science pedagogy, and confidence teaching. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 18(1), 15-31.

Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy, and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 755-777.

Kisiel, J. (2013). Introducing future teachers to science beyond the classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 67-91.

McGinnis, J. R., Hestness, E., Riedinger, K., Katz, P., Marbach-Ad, G., & Dai, A. (2012). Informal science education in formal science teacher preparation. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 1097-1108). Springer Netherlands.

National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards. Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Rennie, L.J. & Johnston, D.J. (2004). The nature of learning and its implications for research on learning from museums. Science Education, 88(S 1), S4-S16.

Russell, R.L. (2002). Museum outreach. Informal Learning, 52, 12-17.