Elementary Science Teachers Adapt Their Practice During a Pandemic
Tammy Dutton Lee, Mark Newton and Bonnie Glass, East Carolina University
The COVID-19 global pandemic created new challenges for teachers and school systems as teachers were forced to rapidly transition to remote learning using new digital tools and resources. Teaching elementary science in “normal times” is challenging due to issues involving teacher preparation, limited access to materials and lack of administrative support due to emphasis on tested subjects, among others. Using reform-based, inquiry practices is challenging when teaching science face-to-face and even more so in an online environment. Compounded with issues of access and equity, teachers faced many problems with moving elementary science instruction online due to COVID-19. This study reports on the experiences of 10 early career teachers who were graduates of a specialized elementary science concentration. Teachers reflect on the challenges faced, how they adapted, and how they designed new learning contexts to teach science. Teachers report on resources they found beneficial, assess needs for the future, and explain how they worked to maintain a sense of community for their students during this unprecedented critical time.
Science, Teacher Innovation, Pandemic
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? Toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+, Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc
Bradbury, L. U., & Wilson, R. E. (2020). Questioning the prevailing narrative about elementary science teachers: An analysis of the experiences of science teacher enthusiasts. Science Education, 104(3), 421-445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21574
Carlone, H. B., Haun‐Frank, J., & Kimmel, S. C. (2010). Tempered radicals: Elementary teachers’ narratives of teaching science within and against prevailing meanings of schooling. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(4), 941–965.
Carrier, S.J., Whitehead, A.N., Walkowiak, T.A., Luginbuhl, S.C., & Thomson, M.M. (2017). The development of elementary teacher identities as teachers of science. International Journal of Science Education, 39(13), 1733-1754. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2017.1351648.
Calabrese Barton, A. (2000). Crafting multicultural science education with preservice teachers through service learning. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 797–820.
Chauhan, S. 2017. “A Meta-analysis of the Impact of Technology on Learning Effectiveness of Elementary Students.” Computers & Education 105: 14–30. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.005.
Cohron, M. (2015). The continuing digital divide in the United States. The Serials Librarian, 69(1), 77-86. doi:10.1080/0361526X.2015.1036195.
Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges New Science Teachers Face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607-651. doi:10.3102/00346543076004607
Eickelmann, B. , and J.Gerick . 2020. “Lernen Mit Digitalen Medien: Zielsetzungen in Zeiten Von Corona Und Unter Besonderer Berücksichtigung Von Sozialen Ungleichheiten [Learning with Digital Media: Objectives in Times of Corona and under Special Consideration of Social Inequities].” Die Deutsche Schule 16: 153–162. doi:10.31244/9783830992318.09.
Federal Communications Commission (2019). Fixed Broadband Deployment Data from FCC Form 477. https://www.fcc.gov/general/broadband-deployment-data-fcc-form-477.
Fox, S. (2016). An Equitable Education in the Digital Age: Providing Internet Access to Students of Poverty. Journal of Education & Social Policy, 3(3), 12-20. Retrieved October 9, 2020, from http://jespnet.com/journals/Vol_3_No_3_September_2016/3.pdf
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
Goodrum, D., Cousins, J., & Kinnear, P. J. (1992). The reluctant primary school teacher. Research in Science Education, 22(2), 163-169.
Hakverdi-Can, M., & Dana, T. M. (2012). Exemplary science teachers’ use of technology. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 94–112.
Hanuscin, D. L., Lee, M. H., & Akerson, V. L. (2011). Elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge for teaching the nature of science. Science Education, 95(1), 145-167. doi:10.1002/sce.20404
Huber, S. G. , and Helm, C. 2020. “COVID-19 and Schooling: Evaluation, Assessment and Accountability in Times of Crises—reacting Quickly to Explore Key Issues for Policy, Practice and Research with the School Barometer.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 1–34. doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09322-y.
Kier, M. & Lee, T. (2017). Exploring the Role of Identity in Elementary Preservice Teachers Who Plan to Specialize in Science. Teaching and Teacher Education. 61(1), 199-210.
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Kozma, R. B. 2011. “ICT, Education Transformation, and Economic Development: An Analysis of the US National Educational Technology Plan.” E-Learning and Digital Media 8 (2): 106–120. doi:10.2304/elea.2011.8.2.106.
Lancker, W. V., & Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), 243-244. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Li, Q. , and X.Ma . 2010. “A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Computer Technology on School Students’ Mathematics Learning.” Educational Psychology Review 22 (3): 215–243. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9125-8.
Luehmann, A. L. (2007). Identity development as a lens to science teacher preparation. Science Education, 91, 822–839.
Masonbrink, A. R., & Hurley, E. (2020). Advocating for Children During the COVID-19 School Closures. Pediatrics, 146(3). doi:https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-1440
McFarlane, A. E. 2019. “Devices and Desires: Competing Visions of a Good Education in the Digital Age.” British Journal of Educational Technology 50 (3): 1125–1136. doi:10.1111/bjet.12764.
Means, B., Bakia, M. and Murphy, R. (2014), Learning Online: What Research Tells Us about Whether, When and How, Routledge.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,
Milner, A. R., Sondergeld, T. A., Demir, A., Johnson, C. C., Czerniak, C. M. (2012). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about teaching science and classroom practice: An examination of pre/post NCLB testing in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 111-132
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge (6th ed., Vol. 108, pp. 1017-1054, Rep.). New York City, NY: Teachers College Record.
Müller, L.-M., & Goldenberg, G. (2020). Education in times of crisis: The potential implications of school closures for teachers and students. Chartered College of Teaching. Retrieved from https://my.chartered.college/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/CCTReport070520_FINAL.pdf
Murphy, C., Neil, P., & Beggs, J. (2007). Primary science teacher confidence revisited: Ten years on. Educational Research, 49(4), 415-430. doi:10.1080/00131880701717289
National Center for Education Statistics (2017). Number and percentage of public school students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch, by state: Selected years, 2000-01 through 2015-16. Digest of Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_204.10.asp.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press. doi:10.17226/11625
National Research Council. (2012). Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academy Press. doi:10.17226/13165
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
Roth, K. J. (2014). Elementary science teaching. In N. G. Lederman & S. K. Abell (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (Vol. 2, pp. 361–394). New York, NY: Routledge.
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science, 47(3). doi:10.1002/tea.20326
Sawyer, R.K. (Ed.) (2005), “Introduction: the new science of learning”, The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press.
Selwyn, N. 2012. Education in a Digital World: Global Perspectives on Technology and Education . New York, London: Routledge.
Sen, A., & Tucker, C. E. (2020). Social Distancing and School Closures: Documenting Disparity in Internet Access among School Children. 1-28. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3572922
Schneider, R. M., Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2005). Enacting reform-based science materials: The range of teacher enactments in reform classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 283-312. doi:10.1002/tea.20055
Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L., & Hunter, A. (2011). Professional Development Needs and Outcomes for Education:Engaged Scientists: A Research-Based Framework. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56(3), 235-246. doi:10.5408/thiry-v56p235
Title I – Improving The Academic Achievement Of The Disadvantaged, § 70-SEC. 6301 (U.S. Government Publishing Office 1965).
Upadhyay, B. (2009). Negotiating identity and science teaching in a high‐stakes testing environment: An elementary teacher’s perceptions. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4(3), 569–586.
Weiss, I. R. (1978). Report of the 1977 national survey of science, mathematics, and social studies education. Research Triangle Park, NC: Center for Research and Evaluation, Research Triangle Institute.
Weiss, I. R., Pasley, J. D., Smith, P. S., Banilower, E. R., & Heck, D. J. (2003). Looking inside
the classroom: A study of K-12 mathematics and science education in the United States. Chapel Hill, NC: Horizon Research, Inc.
Whittle, C., Tiwari, S., Yan, S., & Williams, J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching environment: A conceptual framework for responsive online teaching in crises. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 311-319. doi:DOI10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0099
Zembylas, M. (2004). Emotion metaphors and emotional labor in science teaching. Science Education, 55, 301–324.