Global Learning Using Biology PBL: A Texas-China Collaboration in Middle Grade Genetics
21st century and global skills are generally described as competencies for communication and problem solving skills as well as developing the ability to view content-specific issues through a multicultural perspective. Preparing K-12 students for science futures means they must have opportunities to concurrently acquire skills in 21st century and global learning. Additionally, the professional biology community has called for advancing middle grades students’ knowledge of complex scientific phenomena using novel pedagogies like Project-Based Learning (PBL). Thus, middle grade educators are now tasked to design classroom opportunities for STEM-focused PBL using global interaction such to develop and refine global and 21st century skills and developing students’ content knowledge. This classroom centered project paired middle school students in Texas with Chinese peers to collaborate on a biology-based Project-Based Learning (PBL) activity on the complex topic of genetics. During the 7 day-long unit on heredity, the goal was to utilize global collaboration in STEM to not only understanding inheritance and differentiate between dominant and recessive traits, but also embed global competencies and 21st century skills. The context, planning, and outcomes of the global collaboration are discussed as well as recommendation for future collaborations in Global STEM collaborations in middle school.
21st century skills; Genetics; Global Collaboration; Heredity; Project Based Learning; STEM Education
Ahlfeldt, S., Mehta, S., & Sellnow, T. (2005). Measurement and analysis of student engagement in university classes where varying levels of PBL instruction methods are in use.
Higher Education Research & Development, 24, 5–20.
Ananiadou, K. & Claro, M. (2009), “21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries”, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154
Armbruster, P., Patel, M., Johnson, E., & Weiss, M. (2009). Active learning and student-centered pedagogy improve student attitudes and performance in introductory biology. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 8(3), 203-213.
Atwater, M. M. (2010). Multicultural science education and curriculum materials. Science Activities, 47(4), 103-108.
Au, W. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational researcher, 36(5), 258-267.
Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful Learning: A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. Book Excerpt. George Lucas Educational Foundation.
Barton, A. C. (2001). Science education in urban settings: Seeking new ways of praxis through critical ethnography. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 899-917.
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House, 83(2), 39-43.
Burnouf, L. (2004). Global Awareness and Perspectives in Global Education. Canadian Social Studies, 38(3), n3.
Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.
Calabrese Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-
Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37-75.
Camicia, S. P., & Zhu, J. (2012). Synthesizing multicultural, global, and civic perspectives in the elementary school curriculum and educational research. The Qualitative Report,
Carano, K. T. (2013). Global educators’ personal attribution of a global perspective. Journal of International Social Studies, 3(1), 4-18.
Carlone, H. B., Scott, C. M., & Lowder, C. (2014). Becoming (less) scientific: A longitudinal study of students’ identity work from elementary to middle school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(7), 836-869.
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469-491.
Chin, C., & Chia, L. G. (2006). Problem‐based learning: Using ill‐structured problems in biology project work. Science Education, 90(1), 44-67.
Chinn, C. A., & Malhotra, B. A. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86(2), 175-218.
Clarke, V. (2004). Students’ global awareness and attitudes to internationalism in a world of cultural convergence. Journal of Research in International Education, 3(1), 51-70.
Cobern, W. W., Schuster, D., Adams, B., Applegate, B., Skjold, B., Undreiu, A., & Gobert, J. D. (2010). Experimental comparison of inquiry and direct instruction in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 28(1), 81-96.
Davis, V., & Lindsay, J. (2013). Flattening Classrooms, Engaging Minds: Move to Global Collaboration One Step at a Time. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Scott, P., & Mortimer, E. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Duit, R., & Treagust, D. F. (2012). How can conceptual change contribute to theory and practice in science education?. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 107-118). Springer Netherlands.
Ferreira, R. (2011). Development of an Instrument to Measure High School Students’ Global
Awareness and Attitudes: Looking Through the Lens of Social Sciences. FIU Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 373.
Furtak, E. M., Seidel, T., Iverson, H., & Briggs, D. C. (2012). Experimental and quasi-experimental studies of inquiry-based science teaching a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 82(3), 300-329.
Gardner, A., Enshan, L, & Fuchs, B. (n.d.). Biology Programs in the Peoples Republic of China and the United States. [PowerPoint Slides]. Retrieved from
Glazer, N., & Moynihan, D. (1970). Beyond the Melting Pot. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International journal for the scholarship of teaching and learning, 3(2), 16.
Greenhill, V. (2010). 21st Century Knowledge and Skills in Educator Preparation. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Partnership for 21st Century Skills. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED519336).
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2014). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International
Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089-1113.
Hanvey, R. G. (1982). An attainable global perspective. Theory into practice, 21(3), 162-167.
Hayden, K., Ouyang, Y., Scinski, L., Olszewski, B., & Bielefeldt, T. (2011). Increasing student interest and attitudes in STEM: Professional development and activities to engage and inspire learners. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 11(1), 47-69.
Hayes, W. (2006). The Progressive Education Movement: Is it Still a Factor in Today’s Schools?. Rowman & Littlefield Education.
Hernández-Ramos, P., & De La Paz, S. (2009). Learning history in middle school by designing multimedia in a project-based learning experience. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 151-173.
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement.
Hunter, W. D. (2004). Got global competency. International Educator, 13(2), 6-12.
Kim, B. (2001). Social Constructivism. In M. Orey (Ed.), Emerging perspectives on learning, teaching, and technology. Retrieved 19 July, 2016, from http://epltt.coe.uga.edu/
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). New York: Cambridge.
Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. R. (2010). Seven essentials for project-based learning. Educational leadership, 68(1), 34-37.
Lomos, C., Hofman, R. H., & Bosker, R. J. (2011). Professional communities and student achievement–a meta-analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 22(2),
Lou, S. J., Shih, R. C., Diez, C. R., & Tseng, K. H. (2011). The impact of problem-based learning strategies on STEM knowledge integration and attitudes: An exploratory study among Taiwanese senior high school students. International Journal of Technology & Design Education, 21, 195–215.
McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., Wallace, M., Greenwood, A., Hawkey, K., & Smith, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective professional learning communities. London: Department for Education and Skills.
Minner, D. D., Levy, A. J., & Century, J. (2010). Inquiry‐based science instruction—what is it and does it matter? Results from a research synthesis years 1984 to 2002. Journal of research in science teaching, 47(4), 474-496.
Morrison, J., McDuffie, A. R., & French, B. (2015). Identifying key components of teaching and learning in a STEM school. School Science and Mathematics, 115, 244–255.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM Education: Identifying Effective Approaches in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Neal, G., Mullins, T., Reynolds, A., & Angle, M. (2013). Global collaboration in teacher education: A case study. Creative Education, 4(9), 533-539.
Nugent, J., Smith, W., Cook, L., & Bell, M. (2015). 21ST-CENTURY CITIZEN SCIENCE. The Science Teacher, 82(8), 34-38.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2016). Framework for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_framework_0816.pdf
Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315-329.
Perry, L. B., & McConney, A. (2010). Does the SES of the school matter? An examination of socioeconomic status and student achievement using PISA 2003. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1137-1162.
Saavedra, A. R., & Opfer, V. D. (2012). Learning 21st-century skills requires 21st-century teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 94(2), 8-13.
Schlein, C., & Garii, B. (2011). Cross-cultural interpretations of curricular contextual crossings. Issues in Teacher Education, 20(2), 81.
Shih, Y. C. D., & Cifuentes, L. (2003). Taiwanese intercultural phenomena and issues in a United States-Taiwan telecommunications partnership. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 51(3), 82-90.
Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: Learning as network-creation. ASTD Learning News, 10(1).
Spencer, B., & Castano, E. (2007). Social class is dead. Long live social class! Stereotype threat among low socioeconomic status individuals. Social Justice Research, 20(4), 418-432.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAARTM) Assessments. (2013). STAAR Standard Setting Technical Report. Retrieved from: tea.texas.gov/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=25769804117
Stoll, L., Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Wallace, M., & Thomas, S. (2006). Professional learning communities: A review of the literature. Journal of educational change, 7(4), 221-258.
Texas Education Agency (2017). Test Information At A Glance. Retrieved from
Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary students’ conceptual status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 205–235.
Visscher, P. M., Hill, W. G., & Wray, N. R. (2008). Heritability in the genomics era—concepts and misconceptions. Nature Reviews Genetics, 9(4), 255–66.