By Margareta Maria Thomson
and John L. Nietfeld
NC State University

https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0009

Abstract

In the current study, we investigated how preservice teachers (N = 242) from three different teacher-training programs with a STEM focus, namely the Elementary Education (ELM), Science Education, and Mathematics Education, compare with respect to science content knowledge, metacognitive monitoring, and their belief system. Findings revealed that the ELM preservice teachers reported higher levels of science reformed beliefs (e.g., constructivist instruction), but low science content knowledge and teaching efficacy beliefs. Alternatively, Science Education students exhibited the highest levels of content knowledge, accurate monitoring, and higher teaching efficacy beliefs. Implications for teacher education programs with a STEM training focus are discussed.

Keywords

STEM, Preservice Teachers, Professional Training

Full Text:

PDF

References

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (2007). Preparing STEM teachers: The key to global competitiveness. Selected profiles of teacher preparation programs. Washington: Author

Author, in review [details removed for review]

Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 3-38.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

Bell, P., & Lin, M. C. (2002). Beliefs about science: How does science instruction contribute? In B. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.321-346).Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Dellinger, A. M., Bobbet, J. J., Olivier, D. F., & Ellet, C. D. (2008). Measuring teachers‟ self- efficacy beliefs: Development and use of the TEBS – Self. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 751-766.

Enochs, L. G. & Riggs, I. M. (1990). Further Development of an Elementary Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument: A preservice elementary scale. School Science and Mathematics, 90, 695-706.

Hacker, D. J., Bol, L., Horgan, D. D., & Rakow, E. A. (2000). Test prediction and performance in a classroom context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 160-170.

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A. C. (2009). Handbook of Metacognition in Education. New York: Routledge.

Hammer, D. & Elby, A. (2002). On the form of a personal epistemology. In B. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.169-190). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jehng, J. J., Johnson, S. D., & Anderson, R. C. (1993). Schooling and student’s epistemological beliefs about learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(1), 23–35.

Jones, E. (2008). Predicting performance in first-semester college basic writers: Revisiting the role of self-beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 209-238.

Kardash, C. M., & Scholes, R. J. (1996). Efects of preexisting beliefs, epistemological beliefs, and need for cognition on interpretation of controversial issues. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 260-271.

Kennedy, M. M., Ahn, S., & Choi, J. (2008). The value added by teacher education. In M. CochranSmith, S. Feiman-Nemser, & J. McIntyre (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education (pp.1249–1273). New York: Macmillan

Keren, G. (1991). Calibration and probability judgments: Conceptual and methodological issues. Acta Pscyhologica, 77, 217–273.

Kramarski, B., & Michalsky, T. (2009). Investigating preservice teachers’ professional growth in self-regulated learning environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 161-175.

Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it: How difficulties in recognizing one’s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 1121–1134.

Ku, K. Y. L., & Ho, I. T. (2010). Metacognitive strategies that enhance critical thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5, 251-267.

Kuhn, D. (1989).Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.

Lee, O., Hart, J. Cuevas, J., & Enders, C. (2004). Professional development in inquiry-

based science for elementary teachers of diverse student groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 1021-1043.

Leou, M., Abder, P., Riordan, M., & Zollar, U. (2004). Using ‘HOCS-Centered Learning’ as a pathway to promote science teachers’ metacognitive development. Research in Science

Lumpe, A. T., Haney, J. J., & Czerniak, C. M. (2000). Assessing Teachers’ Beliefs about their Science Teaching Context. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 275-292.

Manlove, S., Lazonder, A. W., & de Jong, T. (2007). Software scaffolds to promote regulation during scientific inquiry learning. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 141-155.

Mansour, N. (2009). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Issues, implications and research agenda. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4, 25-48.

Michalsky, T. (2012). Shaping self-regulation in science teachers’ professional growth: Inquiry skills. Science Education, 96, 1106-1133.

Michalsky T., & Schecheter,C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ capacity to teach self-regulated learning: Integrating learning from problems and learning from success. Teaching and Teacher Education, 30, 60-73.

National Academies of Science (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington: Author.

National Research Council (NRC). (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Council on Conceptual Framework for the New K-12 Science Education Standards, National Research Council. Retrieved on May 13, 2013 from: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=13165.

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2004). NSTA Position Statement: Scientific Inquiry.

Nietfeld, J. L., Cao, L., & Osborne, J. W. (2006). The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance and monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 2, 159-179.

Olafson, L. & Schraw, G. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices within and across domains. International Journal of Educational Research, 45, 71-84.

Pajares, F., & Johnson, M. (1996). Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 33, 163-175.

Peters-Burton, E. & Frazier, W. M. (2012). Voices from the front lines: Exemplary science teachers on education reform. School Science and Mathematics, 112, 179–190.

Poon, C-L., Lee, Y-J., Tan, A-L., & Lim, S. S. ( 2012). Knowing inquiry as practice and theory: Developing a pedagogical framework with elementary school teachers. Research in Science Education, 42, 303-327.

Pressley, M., Borkowski, J., & Schneider, W. (1987). Cognitive strategies: Good strategy users coordinate metacognition and knowledge. In R. Vasta and G. Whitehurst (Eds.), Annals of Child Development (Vol. 4, pp. 89-129). Greenwich, CN: JAI.

Randi, J. (2004). Teachers as self-regulated learners. Teachers College Record, 106, 1825-1853.

Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Teacher innovations in self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Zeidner (Eds). Handbook of self-regulation (pp.651-685). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Richardson, G. M., & Liang, L.L. (2008). The use of inquiry in the development of preservice teacher efficacy in mathematics and science. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 20 (1), 1-16.

Riggs, I.M. & Enochs, L.G. (1990). Toward the development of an elementary teacher’s science teaching efficacy belief instrument. Science Education, 74, 625–637.

Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Sawyer, B. E. (2004). Primary-grade teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs, attitudes toward teaching, and discipline and teaching practice priorities in relation to the “responsive classroom” approach. The Elementary School Journal, 104 (4), 321-341.

Schiffman, S. S., Reynolds, M. L., & Young, F. W. (1981). Introduction to multidimensional scaling: Theory, methods, and applications. New York: Academic Press.

Schommer-Aikins, M. (2002). An evolving theoretical framework for an epistemological beliefs system. In B. Hofer & P.R. Pinrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp.103-177). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schraw, G. (2009). A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring accuracy. Metacognition and Learning, 4, 33-45.

Schraw, G., Bendixen, L. D., & Dunkle, M. E. (2002). Development and validation of the Epistemic Beliefs Inventory (EBI). In B.K. Hofer & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 261-275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Schraw, G., Crippen, K. J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111-139.

Schraw, G., & Olafson, L. (2002). Teachers’ epistemological world views and educational practices. Issues in Education, 8, 99-149.

Schraw, G. & Roedel, T. D. (1994). Test difficulty and judgment bias. Memory and Cognition, 22, 63-69.

Sharp, J., Hopkin, R., James, S., Peacock, G., Kelly, L., Davies, D., & Bowker, R. (2009). Teacher preparation and the national primary science curriculum: A twentieth-anniversary perspective. Research Papers in Education, 24(3), 247-263.

Sharp, J. G., Hopkin, R., & Lewthwaite, B. (2011). Teacher perceptions of science in the National Curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 33(17), 2407-2436.

Smith, L. K. & Southerland, S. A. (2007). Reforming practice or modifying reforms? Elementary teachers’ response to the tools of reform. Journal of research in science teaching, 44(3), 396-423.

Swars, S., Hart, L. C., Smith, S. Z., Smith, M., & Tolar, T. ( 2007). A longitudinal study of elementary pre-service teachers’ mathematics beliefs and content knowledge. School Science and Mathematics, 107 (8), 325-335.

Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66-73.

Thomas, G. P., & McRobbie, C. J. (2001). Using a metaphor for learning to improve students’ metacognition in the chemistry classroom. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 222-259.

Thomson, M. M., & Gregory, B. (2013). Elementary Teachers’ Classroom Practices and Beliefs in Relation to US Science Education Reform: Reflections from within. International Journal of Science Education. DOI:10.1080/09500693.2013.791956

Utley, J., Moseley, C., & Bryant, R. (2005). Relationship between science and mathematics teaching efficacy of preservice elementary teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 105(2), 82-88.

Waters-Adams, S. (2006). The relationship between understanding the nature of science and practice: The influence of teachers’ beliefs about education, teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 28(8), 919-944.

Winne, P. H., & Perry, N. E. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Yates, J. F. (1990). Judgment and decision making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 166-183.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-Regulation: Where metacognition and motivation intersect. In Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., Graesser, A. C. (Eds.). Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.

Zohar, A. & Ben David, A. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classrooms situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 59-82.