Relationship of Teacher Leadership with Organizational, Professional, and Individual Outcomes: Proofs from Turkey
Metin Kaya & Kadir Kaplan
Medipol Üniversitesi & Bayburt Üniversitesi
doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0044
Abstract
This study analyzes the relationship between teacher leadership and organizational, professional, and individual outcomes. The analysis is of 44 studies conducted in Turkish or English languages between 2010 and 2022 from electronic databases. All the research was carried out in Turkey. The findings have been combined using the meta-analysis method. Findings show that the mean effect size between teacher leadership and organizational outcomes is high-level (ES=.53 LL=.46 UL=.59); the mean effect size between teacher leadership and professional outcomes is medium-level (ES=.42 LL=.36 UL=.47) the mean effect size between teacher leadership and individual outcomes is medium-level (ES=.48 LL=.36 UL=.58). On the other hand, it is found that the relationship between teacher leadership and organizational outcomes in education zones with lower socio-economic levels is higher than the other relationships.
Keywords
Leadership, teacher leadership, meta-analysis
Full Text
References
Acar, S., Bilen Kazancık, L., Meydan, M., C., Işık, M (2019). İl ve bölgelerin sosyo-ekonomik gelişmişlik eğitimleri SEGE-2017.Ankara, Kalkınma Ajansları Genel Müdürlüğü Yayın No:4.22022 https://www.sanayi.gov.tr/merkez-birimi/b94224510b7b/sege/il-sege – Raporlardan erişildi.
Anglin A.,M., Duan, R., Chen, Y., Panagiotou, O. ve Schmid, C.,H. (2021). Publication and Outcome Reporting Bias, C., H. Schmid, T, Stijnen ve I., R. White (Eds) Handbook of Meta-Analysis (pp.283-313). Boca Raton, Taylor ve Francis.
Balcı, A. (2002). Örgütsel Gelişim: Teori ve uygulama. PegemA Yayıncılık.
Balwant, PT (2016). Yüksek öğretiminde çoğaltılabilir: Bir meta-analitik inceleme ve araştırma gündemi. Liderlik çalışmaları dergisi , 9 (4), 20-42. DOI:10.1002/jls.21423
Borenstein, M ve Hedges, L. (2019). Meta-Analiz için Etki Boyutları. C., Harris, L., Hedges ve J. Valentine (Eds) Araştırma sentezi ve meta-analizinde (ss.207-245) . Russell Sage Vakfı, New York.
Borenstein, M., Hedges, LV, Higgins, JP ve Rothstein, HR (2011). Meta-analiz girişi. Batı Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Bradburn, NM (1969). Psikolojik iyi oluşun yapısı. Aldine Yayıncılık Şirketi .
Cicolini, G., Comparcini, D., & Simonetti, V. (2013). Workplace empowerment and nurses’ job satisfaction: a systematic literature review. Journal of nursing management, 22(7), 855-871.
Çalık, T. (1997). Educational organizations and leadership. Turkish Journal of Social Studies, 1(3), 33-40.
Dinçer, Ö. (1992). Strategic management and business policy. Alpha Publications.
Funder, D. C., & Ozer, D. J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156-168.
Grant, C. (2019). Excavating the South African teacher leadership archive: Surfacing the absences and re-imagining the future. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(1), 37-55. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143217717274
Gürbüz, R., Erdem, E., & Gülburnu, M. (2013). Examining the factors affecting primary school teachers’ mathematics proficiency. Journal of Ahi Evran University Kırşehir Education Faculty, 14(2), 255-272.
Harrison, J., & Lembeck, E. (1996). Emergent teacher leaders. Jossey-Bass.
Jin, Z. C., Zhou, X. H., & He, J. (2015). Statistical methods for dealing with publication bias in meta‐analysis. Statistics in medicine, 34(2), 343-360. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.6342
Karadağ, E., Çiftçi, Ş. K., & Bektaş, F. (2015). Discussion, limitations and suggestions. E. Karadağ (ed.) In Leadership and organizational outcomes (pp. 255-267). Springer, Cham.
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L.(2019). Statistically Analyzing Effect Sizes: Fixed- and Random-Effects Models. in Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp.245-281). Russell Sage Foundation, New York.
Luchini, C., Veronese, N., Nottegar, A., Shin, J. I., Gentile, G., Granziol, U., … & Solmi, M. (2021). Assessing the quality of studies in meta‐research: Review/guidelines on the most important quality assessment tools. Pharmaceutical statistics, 20(1), 185-195.
Nguyen, D., Harris, A., & Ng, D. (2019). A review of the empirical research on teacher leadership (2003–2017): Evidence, patterns and implications. Journal of Educational Administration. 58 (1), 60-80 https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-02-2018-0023
Paul, J., & Barari, M. (2022). Meta‐analysis and traditional systematic literature reviews—What, why, when, where, and how?. Psychology & Marketing. 10.1002/mar.21657
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
Sawyer, J. M. (2005). A case study of teacher leadership as a strategy for implementing change. Doctoral Thesis. Boston College.
Schott, C., van Roekel, H., & Tummers, L. G. (2020). Teacher leadership: A systematic review, methodological quality assessment and conceptual framework. Educational Research Review, 31, 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100352
Shen, J., Wu, H., Reeves, P., Zheng, Y., Ryan, L., & Anderson, D. (2020). The association between teacher leadership and student achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 31, 100357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100357
Şahin, E. (2010). The effect of primary school classroom teachers’ teaching style preferences, gender, professional seniority, self-efficacy perceptions and readiness for self-directed learning on their professional competencies. Doctoral Thesis. İstanbul: Yıldız Teknik Universty.
Uysal, S., & Sarier, Y. (2019). Teacher Leadership Effects on Student Achievement and Student Satisfaction: A Meta-analysis of the Studies Published in Turkey and the USA. Croatian Journal of Education, 21(3), 989-1010. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v21i3.3257
Wang, M. ve Ho, D. (2019). 21. amaçtan temalar. Uluslararası Eğitim Yönetimi Dergisi. 34 (2), 354-372. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-01-2019-0038