Comparing Teaching Methods in an Environmental Education Field Trip Program
Michelle K. Pearce, MAEd, The North Carolina Arboretum, and Tammy D. Lee, PhD, East Carolina University
https://doi.org/10.46767/kfp.2016-0037
ABSTRACT
This study investigates the impact of instructional methods based on a one-day informal science field experience comparing a teacher-centered methodology versus a student-centered (inquiry-based) methodology. The 5E learning cycle was selected as the framework for implementing the inquiry-based learning for the treatment groups as it provides the structure of the constructivist learning cycle (Duran & Duran, 2004). The research design followed a quasi-experimental design with a total of three control and three treatment groups representing two individual schools. Each school included at least one treatment and one control group. The study included 117 third grade students. Both groups were given a pre and post assessment measuring the impact of the instructional method of inquiry presented in the 5E format. An independent-measures t-test was used to analyze the results of the means for the post-test assessments (treatment and control) and the means of the retention assessments. Pre-tests indicated variations of prior knowledge between the control and treatment groups. Post-tests indicated similar results of knowledge gains. However, the retention tests for the treatment groups revealed students increased their knowledge from the time of their post-test. The control groups’ retention results were similar to their post-test results indicating knowledge was maintained.
Keywords
Informal education, science, field experience
Full Text
References
Bryce, A. (2015). Soils in schools: embedding soil science in STEM. Teaching Science, 62 (3), 14-18.
Counsell, S., Jacobs, K. & Gatewood, S. (2017). What’s in our soil? Science and Children, 55(1), 58-64.
Dewey. J. (1938). Experience & Education. New York, NY: Macmillan.
Duran, L. B. & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: a learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. The Science Education Review, 3(2), 49-58.
Farmer, J., Knapp, D. & Benton, G. M. (2007). An elementary school environmental education field trip: long-term effects on ecological and environmental knowledge and attitude development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 33-42.
Keeley, P. (2016). Uncovering student ideas in earth and environmental science: 32 new formative assessment probes. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.
Keeley, P. (2011). Formative Assessment Overview. Retrieved from http://uncoveringstudentideas.org/about/overview
Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
Knapp, D., & Barrie, E. (2001). Content Evaluation of an Environmental Science Field Trip. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7.
Lavie Alon, N. & Tal, T. (2015). Student self-reported learning outcomes of field trips: the pedagogical impact. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1279-1298.
Liu, T.-C., Peng, H., Wu, W.-H., & Ming-Sheng, L. (2009). The Effects of Mobile Natural-science Learning Based on the 5E Learning Cycle: A Case Study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society; Palmerston North, 12(4), 344–358.
Louv, R. (2005). Last child in the woods: saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
Magee, P.A. & Wingate, E. (2014). Using inquiry to learn about soil: a fourth grade experience. Science Activities, 51(3), 89-100.
North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2011). Essential standards: grade 3 science unpacked content. Instructional Support Tools for Achieving New Standards, p. 9.
Randler, C. & Hulde, M. (2007). Hands-on versus teacher-centered experiments in soil ecology. Research in Science & Technological Education, 25(3), 329-338.
Sadler, T.D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 235-256.
Subramaniam, K. (2020). A place-based education analysis of prospective teachers’ prior knowledge of science instruction in informal settings. International Journal of Education Research, 99(2020), 101497.
Tal, T., & Morag, O. (2009). Reflective Practice as a Means for Preparing to Teach Outdoors in an Ecological Garden. Journal of Science Teacher Education; Abingdon, 20(3), 245–262. http://dx.doi.org.jproxy.lib.ecu.edu/10.1007/s10972-009-9131-1
Thiry, H., Laursen, S.L., & Hunter, A-B. (2011). What experiences help students become scientists?: A comparative study of research and other sources of personal and professional gains for STEM undergraduates. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 357-388.
Zhang, L. (2016). Is inquiry-based science teaching worth the effort? Science & Education, 25, 897-915.